Which two of the following animals are most closely related to each other?

Which two of the following animals are most closely related to each other?

Anatomy of a coronavirus – an interview with virologist

Items for public release have appeared on HSA forms and have since been made available for public viewing and use. The release of items is one step in ensuring that colleges, districts, and other stakeholders understand how the HSA assesses the core learning goals.
Scientists are looking into the relationships between four different deer species. Species 1 is thought to be the common ancestor, according to scientists. Some characteristics are shared by the four animals. They also have species-specific characteristics.
This community’s species reside around heated vents. As inorganic compounds like sulfides are emitted from the vents, they combine with extremely hot water. Sulfides are used by bacteria to provide food for themselves and other species. Many of these bacteria can be found in the bodies of the community’s giant tubeworms and giant white clams.
Yellowstone National Park reintroduced gray wolves in 1995. The population of coyotes had dropped by half in just two years. Before the gray wolves were reintroduced, coyotes were present in many of the park’s habitats. Coyotes can now be found mostly in the hills and mountains.

How are organisms classified? | evolution | biology

The term “phylogenetic association” refers to when species shared similar ancestors in the past. Two species (B & C) are more closely related to each other than they are to a third species (A) if and only if they have a more recent common ancestor (at Time 2) than the third species (at Time 1).
Crocodiles and birds (the owl) are more closely related to each other than mammals, as seen in the model below (the Gorilla). What is the reason for this? Since scientists have deduced that crocodiles and birds have a shared ancestor that is more recent! The same relationships hold regardless of how the branches of this tree are swiveled:
We don’t read trees across the top from left to right, because the detail about relationships isn’t in where the species fall relative to one another at the tips of the branches. Instead, we read trees from the bottom up, moving forward in time, or from the top down, moving backward in time.
Starting with the egg, we will go back in time to see if the bird branch connects to the crocodile branch first or to the mammal branch first. We can start at the bottom and ask which branching event happened first and which happened later. This tree is part of the Tree of Life, which is made up entirely of small trees like this one.

Are we all related?

Biologists seek to comprehend the evolutionary history and relationships of animal kingdom members, as well as all life. The aim of phylogeny research is to figure out how phyla evolved from one another. The animal kingdom is currently divided into 35 to 40 phyla by most biologists. Scientists build phylogenetic trees to help them figure out which species descended from which ancestors.
Remember that until recently, phylogenetic relationships among animals were determined solely by morphological characteristics and the fossil record. Most of this insight came from scientific understanding of the distinctions and hierarchies between anatomical characteristics. When used alone, however, this data can be deceiving. Through evolutionary history, morphological characteristics can evolve multiple times and independently. Animals with identical traits may seem to have evolved in the same way, but their underlying development may be very different. Modern phylogenetics is now informed by genetic and molecular analyses, in addition to traditional morphological and fossil evidence, thanks to the development of molecular technologies. The animal evolutionary tree has changed significantly as a result of advances in genetics, and it continues to evolve as new DNA and RNA studies on more animal species are conducted.


Since the first appearance of their synapsid ancestors in the Pennsylvanian sub-period of the late Carboniferous period, mammals have gone through several stages of evolution. Many synapsid organisms that looked like mammals existed by the mid-Triassic. In the Jurassic, the lineage that led to today’s mammals broke up; synapsids from this time period include Dryolestes, which is more closely related to extant placentals and marsupials than to monotremes, and Ambondro, which is more closely related to monotremes. 1st Later, the eutherian and metatherian lineages split, with the metatherians being more closely related to marsupials and the eutherians being more closely related to placentals. This divergence may have happened at the same time as Juramaia, the earliest known eutherian, who lived 160 million years ago in the Jurassic.
Following the extinction of non-avian dinosaurs (birds being the only remaining dinosaurs) and many mammalian groups during the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction crisis, placental and marsupial mammals diversified into several different forms and ecological niches during the Paleogene and Neogene, by which time all modern orders had emerged.