Trivial in a sentence
Trivial word in sentence with pronunciation
You may have memorized words like: English meaning of the word “trivial” when you first started learning English; however, now that you have a better understanding of the language, there is a better way for you to learn the meaning of “trivial” through sentence examples.
In English, both of the parts of speech are used to create sentences. The subject and the verb are both present in any sentence (this is also known as the predicate). The person or thing who does something or is mentioned in the sentence is the subject. The action taken by the person or thing, or the definition of the person or thing, is the verb. A sentence isn’t complete unless it has a subject and a verb (for example, in the sentence “Went to Bed,” we don’t know who went to bed).
At least one independent clause and at least one dependent clause are present in a complex sentence containing the word “trivial.” Dependent clauses may refer to the independent clause’s subject (who, which), sequence/time (since, while), or causal elements (because, if).
Trivial , daily vocabulary lessons – word 102
Trivial is a perfectly natural and common word in the English language. It won’t be one of the first words kids hear, but it should be known by the time they hit high school, if not sooner.
So, what do you consider “common”? In New York City, a toddler might know what a bodega is, while in Baltimore or Salt Lake City, you might hit middle age and never hear the term. And a toddler in Los Angeles might know what it is, but not in the same way that a New Yorker does.
Estimating prevalence based on samplings of reported contact is one choice (e.g. broadcast media, print publications). A variety of corpora have been created specifically for this function. For what it’s worth, a scan of the Corpus of Contemporary American English yields the following results:
Of course, those terms aren’t synonymous with trivial in all situations. Minor and useless have non-synonymous definitions that are likely to be more common. Stuff like names can cause false positives (for example, the board game Trivial Pursuit). Furthermore, since not all speakers are represented equally in documented communication, a corpus would naturally over-represent certain texts while under-representing others. Also, written language appears to lag behind spoken language when it comes to conversational use, and there have traditionally been far more collections of written English than transcriptions of spoken English.
Trivial in a sentence with pronunciation
Trivial meaning in hindi english and bengali ll synonym of
In this paper, I present and defend the Triviality Theory of Truth (TT), which is analogous to Matti Eklund’s Inconsistency Theory of Truth (IT). The validity of a particular formulation of (TT) is defended, and alternatives found in the literature are compared. A variety of counter-arguments to the proposed principle of meaning-constitutivity are explored but found to be unconvincing. The main emphasis, however, is on the issue, which Gupta and Belnap address in depth, that speakers do not accept Curry derivations’ epistemically neutral conclusions. First, I argue that the details about speakers’ reactions to Curry derivations in general do not pose a problem for (TT). Instead, they are founded on undisputed, objective evidence. Then I suggest a solution that is consistent with (TT) as far as I can tell. Finally, I propose an answer to their objection based on a normative interpretation.
Notice No. 3 I suggest that the fact that a speaker is disposed to accept a concept as a consequence of her semantic competence means that I she is competent with the term e, and (ii) being disposed to accept the principle is a sufficient condition for being competent with e. Acceptance of a sentence schema implies acceptance of its instances, and the same is true for inference rules. To be inclined to accept a particular inference (i.e., an instance of an inference rule) is simply to be inclined to accept the conclusion if
The scope of the alleged abuse, as exposed by parliamentary investigations, court trials, secret police archives, and whistleblowers, dwarfs David Cameron’s alleged supper-for-sale situation.
The committee proposes a “yellow card” strategy, in which applicants who break laws unintentionally or trivially receive “pre-sanction written notices” rather than getting their payments halted.
Although insignificant, I believe my experience demonstrates how financial institutions such as NatWest have manipulated the hard-working, responsible earner; violated the confidence put in them; creamed off the handsome profits that resulted from their reckless lending; and now try to portray themselves as “responsible” at the cost of those who have fed them.